I have been involved in different team groups throughout my employment
as a Director for a Large Childcare Center. The center was a part of a
non-profit organization whose mission was to lead through action to make a
difference in people’s lives for all ages. They are a big non-profit in our
area and provide programs for families including babies up into late adulthood.
As a supervisor I was asked to sit in a group with other
supervisors to listen to all of the workman’s comp injuries for the month, to
assure that the company was following protocol and employees were also being
truthful about their injury disclosures. The leader of the group was the person
who gathered the workman’s comp information from the employee. Other dynamics
of the group were her supervisor and 8 supervisors like me.
Our group was very successful. We had a leader that stayed
on task and facilitated. Her supervisor was there only as an observer. The rest
of us did a good job talking through injury scenarios and really looking at
what as a company we could do better to insure staff would not get hurt. One
big issue we found was that staff who worked with the brain injured adults had
a lot of back injuries because they were not trained properly on transfer
procedures and on individual care plans.
Monthly we would get an agenda of the cases. It was noted
that they would serve us lunch. When we arrived they told us that we had been
doing such a good job they wanted to give us a nice lunch. They gave us a
certificate of appreciation. As the meeting was to adjourn they informed us
that this was the last time we would meet because they felt that it would be
better if the workman’s comp investigator would meet individually with the
supervisor of the injured party and her team leads to come up with solutions
within individual departments. We were all dismayed because we felt that we had
provided a very important service to the company. They did not ask us how we felt
they just made the decision to change their procedures.
Having a lunch was a good way to adjourn the group as well
as giving us certificates of appreciation. Abudi argues when adjourning it
gives the team an opportunity to say good-bye to each other and wish each other
luck as they pursue their next endeavor (Abudi, 2010). We were grateful for
that opportunity to come together for one last time but we were unhappy the
group was disbanded.
Reference
Abudi, G. (2010). The five stages of team development: A
case study. Retrieved from http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/the-five-stages-of-team-development-a-case-study.html
Diana
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like it was time to move on, however they did not give you appropriate notification. It would have been nice if they told you before the last day that you met. Overall do you feel that the group succeeded? I know that those types of cases can be very difficult to investigate at times. At a previous job that I had we also had to go through more training due to the the open cases and the identifying causes.
I have really enjoyed reading your blog post these past 2 weeks. You have wrote abotu some very interesting things and I have learned a lot about you. I hope to have some more classes together as the program goes on. I want to also thank you for reading my post and being an inspirational leader. I really do appreciate it.
ReplyDelete